How to Overcome Those Who Object on Aesthetic Grounds
Posted: 08 April 2007 02:49 PM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  108
Joined  2007-04-05

The most common objection I hear to this otherwise clean and unobtrusive power source is that it spoils the natural beauty of the area. I personally feel otherwise, thinking that an area that is as environmentally conscious as to support wind turbines is a beautiful area indeed.

Where I lived in Wales there were a lot of turbines, just out of town. The locals didn’t seem to mind on the whole, though some spoke out. But here in America LOTS of people seem VERY vocal when it comes to this. Why? I think they are really kind of cute.

How do we overcome this kind of problem and move into more Earth friendly power sources?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 April 2007 03:22 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  205
Joined  2007-08-27

Personaly I think that the best place for wind turbines in along the cost lines. The wind is stong and constant and if you put them about a mile out, barely anyone will every even see them.

To answer your questions, ask the people which is worse:
acid rain and smoggy skies or a few wind turbines peppering the horizon.

 Signature 

Energy conservation is the foundation of energy independence.
Thomas H. Allen

Check out Our Conservation Products and Save!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 April 2007 10:14 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  11
Joined  2007-04-07

I also think that the virtues of turbines vastly out weigh the aesthetic issues,without huge improvements in fuel and waste issues the beautiful scenery being complaned about is not goint to exist for too much longer. As Adam has said careful siting would reduce the visual impact, and if properly planned would balance out any extra costs caused by increased cabling costs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 April 2007 10:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  11
Joined  2007-04-07

apologies double post

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 April 2007 02:39 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  20
Joined  2007-04-04

I say we show them photos of typical coal and nuclear power plants.  Those aren’t exactly aesthetically pleasing, either.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 April 2007 05:43 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  205
Joined  2007-08-27

lol yep, I think that would do it…

 Signature 

Energy conservation is the foundation of energy independence.
Thomas H. Allen

Check out Our Conservation Products and Save!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 April 2007 02:45 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  10
Joined  2007-04-16

Hehe yeah, a few harmless looking white fans or a couple of large cooling towers and a few concrete block buildings surrounded by miles of wire fencing? I know which I’d take…

I think those who live in cities with the constant reminder of pollution are less objective to wind turbines. It is more those in rural areas who have had the benefit of (relatively) clean air who don’t like the idea of wind turbines - They don’t really see the need for themselves.

Stick them in one of the busiest city’s in the world for a few days and they might start to see why renewable energy sources like wind turbines are in fact essential.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 June 2007 09:08 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  66
Joined  2007-05-11

I would have no problem with turbines being built in my area. I don’t find them ugly, in comparison to “solutions”. I think that the best place for them would be along the coast, as another poster said, because there is a lot of wind to benefit the turbines.

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
‹‹ Turbines for the Home?      In Montana ››
take action
  • Subscribe to our weekly CO2 reduction tips; Learn alot, Help alot & Save alot too!
  • Name:
  • Email: